Sunday, April 11, 2010
Chapter 25
DANGER: Reading this book may be challenging! The bible is crazy stuff. Jesus might ask you to walk out on the water. This is no boring sunday school animal cracker stuff. Wake up people and smell that salty sea breeze- because we're jumping in.
I find it interesting that Drane puts “Understanding the NT” at the end of his book. It is kind of funny, because I think if the reader was paying any attention to how Drane worked through scripture they would be able to understand how to “Read and Understand the NT”. If I was going to have coffee with good ol’ Drane I might suggest to him that he put this chapter at the start of this book. But nevertheless, he still makes some really awesome points about the NT and how past and present cultures have interpreted it!
If an ol’ average Western Christian understands the Bible to be a solid book, sent from God, good for readin’ on Sundays and at funerals... well they got something coming! The NT alone, is a crazy collection of stories and epistles, Jesus and Elijah recordings, angels and demons, pigs and Pharisees, wells and women, danger and deceit, but most importantly: love and redemption. It is a collection of words: words that follow more words. But unlike a boring blog post or essay they have the power to bring you to your knees. They have the power to literally transform lives. That is because God has worked through history to make these words available to people. And so they are HIS TOOL, HIS PROPERTY, and he uses them mightily and accordingly.
The sad part about this is so few who read it choose to engage deeply with the word of God and as Drane points out, they decide to be the impartial Investigator/Observer. When what God really longs for is : a personal engagement into scripture stories and then apply them to our own lives. I think this part is done a lot less because it makes us UNCOMFORTABLE and VULNERABLE. It takes courage, sacrifice and risk. Reading the Bible is intense stuff- it is up there with mountain climbing if you ask me. Jesus challenges us to be the character in his story that needs help, who needs comfort, and who needs salvation. To do this you need to swallow pride. As Drane points out, this can be a very difficult task for Western Christians.
In the gospel stories, Jesus interacts with many characters, affecting and challenging them in different ways. Changing water into wine for example includes: Mother Mary, the servants, the bridgegroom, the Master of the banquet, and the disciples. Depending on where we are in life and our biases will influence who we choose to relate to. We should seek however, to be objective and try to understand the different ways in which people react to Jesus in the Gospels.
Over the centuries, interpretation of the bible has changed as culture has changed. The scientific Revolution brought on a very “reductionist” approach to scripture reading. This would not be very helpful at all as the approach seeks to simplify the text.
Understanding the context and background to scripture can be so helpful and important when reading. After I grasped the idea of Jesus being the fullfillment of the Jewish prophecy I could understand the different struggles of the new church. There was a huge transition going on! AKA... moving from Judiasm to Christianity. Some got on the wagon and some did not- and the early Church was stuck in the middle of it. The epistles become much clearer after understanding this. Ideas on spirituality were also very different: in our age of technology one only thinks of seeing an angel on top of a Christmas tree. But in ancient Roman culture, the spiritual world was much more intertwined with daily thought. Many other background context gives understanding to the modern reader in a way that helps to apply God’s word to daily life.
PS. Thanks Danny and NT class for a great experience. I learned a lot that has enriched my personal faith and my outward ministry. Awesome!
Thursday, April 1, 2010
Chapter 24
Revelation 1:1-3 The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John, who testifies to everything he saw—that is, the word of God and the testimony of Jesus Christ. Blessed is the one who reads the words of this prophecy, and blessed are those who hear it and take to heart what is written in it, because the time is near.
From what I have gathered in Paul’s writings and missionary journeys he was a genuine mean longing to proclaim Christ’ salvation to the nations. Of course he was still human and made mistakes. He was also very bold and God-confident in what he was preaching (as this was the case with other apostle ministry). These create for a ministry that will make people UNCOMFORTABLE and CHALLENGED – that’s because Jesus’ truth isn’t necessarily comfortable. The result is a people’s response. From the book of Revelation we gather that there was a type of response that decided to create a new interpretation of who Jesus is: Nicolaitans, Balaamites, ‘Jezebel’ etc. I imagine that the apostles prayed for these people and also tried to address their questions and interpretations. But this was not enough. So Jesus decided to directly speak to them! Whoa!
John discusses ‘false prophets’. From his writings we can gather that they were individuals who believed to have some further revelation for God and therefore had a more intimate relationship with him. They were no longer in need of refinement as they were already perfect. This would have been very confusing indeed for the early church! Docetism was also a circulating ‘theology’ at the time. Followers of this theology believed that Jesus was not actually fully human but only fully God who only seemed to appear as a human. This probably arose from the common Greek thought that the human world is very separated from the god world and missing the two was difficult to comprehend. John’s letters address issues surrounding the false prophet influence and urge the church to remain true to Jesus’ teachings and salvation.
I am a bit confused/curious about when John would have wrote John (Gospel), 1 John, and Revelation. When in this writing process did he receive his vision from Jesus? How long was this false prophecy going on before Jesus gave him said vision?
Jude and 2 Peter also seem to address ‘false prophet’ issues in the church in a similar manner as John does. The false prophets again believed that they were completely holy and didn’t need any cleansing from Jesus. Therefore they also believed that Christ’ 2nd coming wasn’t really going to happen because they were in no need of further resurrection. 2 Peter addresses some theological problems associated with this belief including: just because it hasn’t happened yet, doesn’t mean God won’t still fulfill his promise for a 2nd coming.
It is interesting to look at these books as an example for how the church should address ‘bad theology’ issues. We should have no tolerance for teaching that goes against: Christ’ ability to purify us, his power, or his authority. This however should be done with love and grace.
From what I have gathered in Paul’s writings and missionary journeys he was a genuine mean longing to proclaim Christ’ salvation to the nations. Of course he was still human and made mistakes. He was also very bold and God-confident in what he was preaching (as this was the case with other apostle ministry). These create for a ministry that will make people UNCOMFORTABLE and CHALLENGED – that’s because Jesus’ truth isn’t necessarily comfortable. The result is a people’s response. From the book of Revelation we gather that there was a type of response that decided to create a new interpretation of who Jesus is: Nicolaitans, Balaamites, ‘Jezebel’ etc. I imagine that the apostles prayed for these people and also tried to address their questions and interpretations. But this was not enough. So Jesus decided to directly speak to them! Whoa!
John discusses ‘false prophets’. From his writings we can gather that they were individuals who believed to have some further revelation for God and therefore had a more intimate relationship with him. They were no longer in need of refinement as they were already perfect. This would have been very confusing indeed for the early church! Docetism was also a circulating ‘theology’ at the time. Followers of this theology believed that Jesus was not actually fully human but only fully God who only seemed to appear as a human. This probably arose from the common Greek thought that the human world is very separated from the god world and missing the two was difficult to comprehend. John’s letters address issues surrounding the false prophet influence and urge the church to remain true to Jesus’ teachings and salvation.
I am a bit confused/curious about when John would have wrote John (Gospel), 1 John, and Revelation. When in this writing process did he receive his vision from Jesus? How long was this false prophecy going on before Jesus gave him said vision?
Jude and 2 Peter also seem to address ‘false prophet’ issues in the church in a similar manner as John does. The false prophets again believed that they were completely holy and didn’t need any cleansing from Jesus. Therefore they also believed that Christ’ 2nd coming wasn’t really going to happen because they were in no need of further resurrection. 2 Peter addresses some theological problems associated with this belief including: just because it hasn’t happened yet, doesn’t mean God won’t still fulfill his promise for a 2nd coming.
It is interesting to look at these books as an example for how the church should address ‘bad theology’ issues. We should have no tolerance for teaching that goes against: Christ’ ability to purify us, his power, or his authority. This however should be done with love and grace.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)